![]() |
Nigeria and SA's fragile economic recoveryAs expected, quarterly national accounts data published by national statistical agencies in Nigeria and South Africa indicated that both countries have emerged from recession, according to research published by Coface, the international trade credit insurance company. ![]() © Praphan Jampala via 123RF In Q2 2017, Nigeria GDP grew by a dismal 0.6% year-on-year, after five consecutive quarters of contraction. Over the period from March to June, South Africa grew at an annual rate of 2.5% quarter-on-quarter. Nevertheless, positive figures are mainly a result of Nigeria and South Africa bouncing back from very poor performance, according to Coface. Exposed to internal and external headwinds, Nigeria and South Africa’s economic woes are not over; the recovery is still fragile. Agricultural performanceBoth in Nigeria and South Africa, agriculture is the main positive contribution to GDP growth in Q2 2017. After an El Niño-induced drought afflicted South Africa in 2016, agriculture, boosted by better rainfalls, recorded a 13% y-o-y growth. This figure is in line with the latest forecast from the Crop Estimates Committee, which indicates a possible 108.8% increase in maize output, the main crop, for the 2017 season. An increase in crop output is also the main reason for the solid performance of the Nigerian primary sector. CommoditiesNigeria and South Africa also rebounded thanks to improved performance in the extractive industries. The latter were in the doldrums in 2016 because of low commodity prices. Terrorism in the Niger Delta targeting production facilities created disruptions in Nigerian oil supply. Hence, a rebound in oil output after six consecutive quarters of contraction in oil GDP supported an exit from recession. In South Africa, the mining sector - struggling with low profitability for years - benefited from higher commodity prices in order to step up output and confirmed the recovery initiated in Q1 2017. Retail resilienceIn South Africa, the return to positive territory is also attributable to wholesale and retail activities resilience. Statistics South Africa estimates that household final expenditure contributed 2.8 percentage points to Q2 2017 GDP. Easing inflationary pressure supported the recovery in trade activities, which recovered to 0.6% after it contracted by 5.9% in Q1. Similarly, most sectors, except for construction (-0.5% q-o-q) and government services (-0.6% q-o-q), benefited from a positive base effect after bleak performance recorded in Q1 2017. Improved headline growth in Nigeria is also a result of particularly poor performance recorded in the reference period, namely Q2 2016. Risks analysisWidely anticipated, the return to growth in Q2 2017 of sub-Saharan Africa’s two biggest economies could prove short-lived, unfortunately, predicts Coface. Data reveals that growth is still heavily reliant on sectors vulnerable to external headwinds, namely agriculture and extractive industries:
In addition to external headwinds, domestic challenges remain:
|