![]() |
Unpacking tax changes to income protection policies rulesIncome protection policies provide cover against the death, disablement (temporary and permanent), illness or unemployment of an individual. This individual could be the direct policyholder or employed by a company that holds the policy on his or her behalf. ![]() © zerbor – 123RF.com As of the latest tax year (starting 1 March 2015), companies are still struggling to come to grips with the consequences of the changes to the rules in respect of premiums paid to income protection policies for their payroll administration and payroll systems. Old rulesUp until 28 February 2015, premiums that employers paid into employer-owned income protection policies were regarded as a fringe benefit of the same value as the premium. This fringe benefit was deemed to be a premium paid by the employee and the total premium paid by the employee (including any employee-paid premiums) was allowed as a tax deduction. Annuity or lump sum payouts from income protection policies were fully taxable. Reversal of old orderAs of 1 March 2015, new rules that are essentially the opposite of the old ones came into effect. Now, an employer's payment into an income protection policy is treated as a fully taxable fringe benefit, while any payments the employee makes into an income protection policy of his or her own is not tax deductible. Should the employee need to claim from the policy - perhaps due to illness, disability or unemployment, the payout (irrespective of whether it is a lump sum or a monthly annuity income) is not taxable. Administration challengesHere is where some confusion comes in: monthly annuity income from an income protection policy has changed from being taxable (i.e. remuneration) to being not taxable (i.e. not remuneration) from 1 March 2015. This creates some unexpected difficulties in the administration of temporary disability since most of the employment Acts rely on the payment of remuneration to define an employee. If no remuneration is paid, the individual is no longer an employee. If an employee is booked off from work for the reason of temporary disability, and the annuity payout from an income protection policy is the only income he or she receives during this time, the annuity income is no longer remuneration. However, not being defined as an employee must not be confused with the individual's employment status. Prior to the temporary disability period, the individual was an employee, and the employer or employee can only terminate employment for reasons specified in labour law and after following proper procedures. The individual remains employed, even though he or she is no longer an employee by definition. What does the rather contradictory situation of a person not being an employee but still being employed mean in practice? ExampleLet us consider this by means of an example. Temporary disability scenario:
In this scenario, the company should treat the temporary disability lay-off period as a form of unpaid leave. Applying employment lawsEmployers should apply the various employment laws as follows: Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA)
Income Tax Act (Fourth Schedule)
In other words, the individual must be kept on the payroll during the six-month temporary disability period because there is still an employment relationship and because the annuity income must be reported on the tax certificate. If the six-month temporary disability period had started on 1 December 2014, then the annuity income for the last three months of the 2014/15 tax year would have been taxable (code 3601), and the annuity income for the first three months of the 2015/16 tax year would have been not taxable (code 3602). Unemployment Insurance Contributions Act (UICA)
Unemployment Insurance Act (UIA)
About Rob CooperRob Cooper is a tax expert and director of legislation updates and proposed legislation of Sage VIP. View my profile and articles... |